Body size is a better predictor of intra- than interspecific variation of animal stoichiometry across realms  

Mark P. Nessel, Olivier Dézerald, Julian Merder, Karl Andraczek, Ulrich Brose, Michał Filipiak, Michelle Jackson, Malte Jochum, Stan Harpole, Helmut Hillebrand, Shawn J. Leroux, Renske Onstein, George L W Perry, Rachel Paseka, Amanda Rugenski, Judith Sitters, Erik Sperfeld, Maren Striebel, Eugenia Zandona, Hideyuki Doi, Nico Eisenhauer, Vinicius F. Farjalla, Nicholas J. Gotelli, James Hood, Pavel Kratina, Eric K. Moody, Liam N. Nash, Anton M. Potapov, Gustavo Q. Romero, Jean-Marc Roussel, Stefan Scheu, Julia Seeber, Winda Ika Susanti, Alexei Tiunov, Angélica L. González. bioRxiv 2024.  Link to article.

Abstract

Animal stoichiometry affects fundamental processes ranging from organismal physiology to global element cycles. However, it is unknown whether animal stoichiometry follows predictable scaling relationships with body mass and whether adaptation to life on land or water constrains patterns of elemental allocation. To test both interspecific and intraspecific body-size scaling relationships of the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and N:P content of animals, we used a subset of the StoichLife database encompassing 9,933 individual animals (vertebrates and invertebrates) belonging to 1,543 species spanning 10 orders of magnitude of body size from terrestrial, freshwater, and marine realms. Across species, body mass did not explain much variation in %N and %P composition, although the %P of invertebrates decreased with size. The effects of body size on species elemental content were small in comparison to the effects of taxonomy. Body size was a better predictor of intraspecific than interspecific elemental patterns. Between 42 to 45% in intraspecific stoichiometric variation was explained by body size for 27% of vertebrate species and 35% of invertebrate species. Further, differences between organisms inhabiting aquatic and terrestrial realms were observed only in invertebrate interspecific %N, suggesting that the realm does not play an important role in determining elemental allocation of animals. Based on our analysis of the most comprehensive animal stoichiometry database, we conclude that (i) both body size and realm are relatively weak predictors of animal stoichiometry across taxa, and (ii) body size is a good predictor of intraspecific variation in animal elemental content, which is consistent with tissue-scaling relationships that hold broadly across large groups of animals. This research reveals a lack of general scaling patterns in the elemental content  across animals and instead points to a large variation in scaling relationships within and among lineages.